Search
Saturday, May 19, 2012 ..:: Home ::.. Register  Login
 Foundations Minimize

What I'm For
and Against

PRO

  • Atomic power
  • Space Exploration
  • Free Trade
  • Capitalism
  • Home Schooling
  • Liberty
  • Amendments IX and X
  • 10th Commandment
  • Good Manners

ANTI

  • War on Drugs 
  • "Universal" Health Care
  • Religion-based government 
  • Big Government of any kind
  • Compulsory government monopoly mass schooling
  • Income Tax
  • Windmills and other government-subsidized "alternative" energy boondoggles
  • The idea that electing the "right" person will make everything better

 Print   
 Clock Minimize

This excellent clock comes from the Poodwaddle web site.  Yes, that's what it's called!

 


 Print   
 TC Archive Minimize

 Print   
 DownsizeDC Minimize

 Print   
 The Town Crank Minimize
free counters
Feb 2

Written by: Steve Erbach
Monday, February 02, 2009 3:10 AM

...why do I get the feeling that it's simply another example of government control over our lives and the destruction of freedom?  Let me illustrate.

This article is from the Life & Style section of the London Times, believe it or not, and the article was written by the "Health editor" of the Times:

 

February 1, 2009

Two children should be limit, says green guru

COUPLES who have more than two children are being “irresponsible” by creating an unbearable burden on the environment, the government’s green adviser has warned.

Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the government’s Sustainable Development Commission, says curbing population growth through contraception and abortion must be at the heart of policies to fight global warming. He says political leaders and green campaigners should stop dodging the issue of environmental harm caused by an expanding population.

A report by the commission, to be published next month, will say that governments must reduce population growth through better family planning.

“I am unapologetic about asking people to connect up their own responsibility for their total environmental footprint and how they decide to procreate and how many children they think are appropriate,” Porritt said.

“I think we will work our way towards a position that says that having more than two children is irresponsible. It is the ghost at the table. We have all these big issues that everybody is looking at and then you don’t really hear anyone say the “p” word.”

The Optimum Population Trust, a campaign group of which Porritt is a patron, says each baby born in Britain will, during his or her lifetime, burn carbon roughly equivalent to 2½ acres of old-growth oak woodland - an area the size of Trafalgar Square.

The British population, now 61m, will pass 70m by 2028, the Office for National Statistics says. The fertility rate for women born outside Britain is estimated to be 2.5, compared with 1.7 for those born here. The global population of 6.7 billion is expected to rise to 9.2 billion by 2050.

Porritt, who has two children, intends to persuade environmental pressure groups to make population a focus of campaigning.

“Many organisations think it is not part of their business. My mission with the Friends of the Earth and the Greenpeaces of this world is to say: ‘You are betraying the interests of your members by refusing to address population issues and you are doing it for the wrong reasons because you think it is too controversial,” he said.

Porritt, a former chairman of the Green party, says the government must improve family planning, even if it means shifting money from curing illness to increasing contraception and abortion.

He said: “We still have one of the highest rates of teenage pregnancies in Europe and we still have relatively high levels of pregnancies going to birth, often among women who are not convinced they want to become mothers.


So, England's Sustainability czar wants to take up Paul Ehrlich's insistence on zero population growth (ZPG).

What is curious to me is that women born in Britain have already achieved ZPG without being forced by the government to have fewer children.  The article itself says: "The fertility rate for women born outside Britain is estimated to be 2.5, compared with 1.7 for those born here."  Mr. Porritt's concerns have already been addressed by native-born Brits.  It's those dashed foreigners that are munging things up.

Of course Porritt doesn't stop there. Each child born in Britain will, of course, poison the earth by burning "2½ acres of old-growth oak woodland - an area the size of Trafalgar Square."  Well, not literally; but size of the carbon footprint of each human being is now regarded as almost criminal.

This is what "sustainability" is about.

Tags:

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment    Cancel  

  
 Tea Partyer Minimize

Time for a Tea Party!

U.S. Congressman, Maxine Waters, says that the TEA Party "can go straight to hell."  Well, after you, Maxine!


 Print   
 Our Founder Minimize

Our Founder

"Just shut yer yap, leave me alone, and stop raising my blankety blank taxes!"

You are free to add your two cents to any blog entry; but if you want to send a deeply personal message to Our Founder, [click here].


 Print   
 Regular Reading Minimize

 Print   
Copyright 2010 by Steven W. Erbach   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement
DotNetNuke® is copyright 2002-2012 by DotNetNuke Corporation